Quantcast
Channel: INDIASPIRITUALITY
Viewing all 256 articles
Browse latest View live

God manifests to different degree in different beings

$
0
0
Sri Ramakrishna arrived at Govinda Mukherji's house at Beldharia, near Calcutta. Besides Narendra, Ram, and other devotees, some of Govinda's neighbours were present. The Master first sang and danced with the devotees. After the kirtan they sat down. Many saluted the Master. Now and then he would say, "Bow before God."

"It is God alone", he said, "who has become all this. But in certain places — for instance, in a holy man — there is a greater manifestation than in others. You may say, there are wicked men also. That is true, even as there are tigers and lions; but one need not hug the 'tiger God'. One should keep away from him and salute him from a distance. Take water, for instance. Some water may be drunk, some may be used for worship, some for bathing, and some only for washing dishes."

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

Sri Ramakrishna says Bhakti suits better than Jnana in Kaliyuga

$
0
0
A Neighbour: "Thakur ji, what are the doctrines of Vedanta?"

Sri Ramakrishna: 'The Vedantist says, 'I am He.' Brahman is real and the world illusory. Even the 'I' is illusory. Only the Supreme Brahman exists.

"But the 'I' cannot be got rid of. Therefore it is good to have the feeling, 'I' am the servant of God, His son, His devotee.'

"For the Kaliyuga the path of bhakti is especially good. One can realize God through bhakti too. As long as one is conscious of the body, one is also conscious of objects. Form, taste, smell, sound, and touch — these are the objects. It is extremely difficult to get rid of the consciousness of objects. And one cannot realize 'I am He' as long as one is aware of objects.

"The sanyasi is very little conscious of worldly objects. But the house-holder is always engrossed in them. Therefore it is good for him to feel, 'I am the servant of God."

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

We are sinners, what will happen to us?

$
0
0
Neighbour: "Thakur ji, we are sinners. What will happen to us?"

Sri Ramakrishna: "All the sins of the body fly away if one chants the name of God and sings His glories. The birds of sin dwell in the tree of the body. Singing the name of God is like clapping your hands. As, at a clap of the hands, the birds in the tree fly away, so do our sins disappear at the chanting of God's name and glories.

"Again, you find that the water of a reservoir dug in a meadow is evaporated by the heat of the sun. Likewise, the water of the reservoir of sin is dried up by the singing of the name and glories of God.

"You must practice it every day. The other day, at the circus, I saw a horse running at top speed, with an Englishwoman standing on one foot on its back. How much she must have practiced to acquire that skill!

"Weep at least once to see God".

"These, then, are the two means: practice and passionate attachment to God, that is to say, restlessness of the soul to see Him."

Sri Ramakrishna began his midday meal with the devotees. It was about one o'clock. A devotee sang in the courtyard below:

Awake, Mother! Awake! How long Thou hast been asleep
In the lotus of the Muladhara!
Fulfil Thy secret function. Mother:
Rise to the thousand-petalled lotus within the head,
Where mighty Siva has His dwelling;
Swiftly pierce the six lotuses
And take away my grief, O Essence of Consciousness!


Hearing the song, Sri Ramakrishna went into samadhi; his whole body became still, and his hand remained touching the plate of food. He could eat no more. After a long time his mind came down partially to the plane of the sense world, and he said, "I want to go downstairs." A devotee led him down very carefully. Still in an abstracted mood, he sat near the singer. The song had ended. The Master said to him very humbly, "Sir, I want to hear the chanting of the Mother's name again."

The musician sang:

Awake, Mother! Awake! How long Thou hast been asleep
In the lotus of the Muladhara! . . .


Sri Ramakrishna again went into ecstasy.

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

How the Self (soul) which is sentient, becomes the onlooker of the insentient intellect etc?

$
0
0
Question:  Question arises as to how the Self (soul) which is sentient, becomes the onlooker of the insentient intellect etc., because the onlooker can see objects of its own class?

Swami Ramsukhdasji:  The answer is, that the soul identifies itself with the sentient matter and accepts its own separate entity as "I am". This "I" is neither insentient, nor sentient. By identifying itself with matter, it believes "I am rich or I am learned." By giving to consciousness (self), it says, "I am Brahma".

Thus this "I" is the soul seated in Nature, which is the cause of his birth, in good and bad wombs (Gita 13:21). Thus the embodied soul has both the sentient as well as, the insentient. The sentient portion attracts him towards the Lord, while the insentient portion, due to identity with matter; attracts him towards world, and thus he becomes the perceiver (onlooker) of intellect, mind, senses, sense objects and body etc.; This assumed identity or affinity is the root cause of all evils.
Source: "Maanav Jivan Maatre Kalyaan ke Liye Hai" in Hindi pg 80 by Swami Ramsukhdasji

Question:  We understand that this embodied Soul (Jeev) is a part of God, was always a part of God and will always be so, but how and why did it get caught in the birth and death cycle?

Swami Ramsukhdasji:  I can give you the answer to this, but truly, it is not necessary to get entangled in this type of conversation. In fact it is more harmful. How did I become dirty? From where did this dirt come? Who could be responsible for this dirt? How useful can such conversations be? It is not useful at all. When you become dirty, best is to immediately go and clean your self up. What is the point in getting caught up in the whys and hows?

In short, the reason for being entanglement and trapped in the birth and death cycle is attachment. Today, we like money and pleasures, and this is the root cause or main reason for being trapped in the birth and death cycle. The minute we stop liking money and pleasures, we will be released from this vicious cycle. It is that simple! It is because in our minds there is this desire for still wanting to trade.

Therefore, if someone complaints about you, do not worry, do not be concerned. From today, this moment onwards, release everyone. Give them complete freedom. Let them have free will to complaint about you. By releasing them all, you will be released. You will be released and you will benefit immensely. Let them go ahead, full swing complaining about you. You, be quiet. Be Silent. Do not try to explain yourself. Let them say that you are bad, remain unaffected and remain happy, be joyful at all times.

How you got entangled is not so relevant, just get detangled and be silent. By trying to explain this, it is paying disrespect to the Truth. Give up desires and wants. This desire for others to think well of you, wanting respect from them, wanting praise from them, all these are problematic.

Everyone may say he is an enemy of his parents, his teacher, his family etc. (Jaani Ram kutil ker mohi, log kahe guru saaheb drohi)

Whatever anyone wants to say, let them say. With Your grace, let my love for Sita-Ram continue to increase with each passing day. (Sita Ram charan rati more, ........ anugraha Manasa)

Source: "Saadhan, Sudha, Sindhu" in Hindi pg 715 by Swami Ramsukhdasji.

How can one see God?

$
0
0
Sri Ramakrishna (to Ram and the other devotees): "Devotees like Rakhal, Narendra, and Bhavanath may be called nityasiddha. Their spiritual consciousness has been awake since their very birth. They assume human bodies only to impart spiritual illumination to others.

"There is another class of devotees, known as kripasiddha, that is to say, those on whom the grace of God descends all of a sudden and who at once attain His vision and Knowledge. Such people may be likened to a room that has been dark a thousand years, which, when a lamp is brought into it, becomes light immediately, not little by little.

"Those who lead a householder's life should practise spiritual discipline; they should pray eagerly to God in solitude. (To Mr. Choudhury) God cannot be realized through scholarship. Who, indeed, can understand the things of the Spirit through reason? No, all should strive for devotion to the Lotus Feet of God.

"Infinite are the glories of God! How little can you fathom them! Can you ever find out the meaning of God's ways?

"Bhishma was none other than one of the eight Vasus, but even he shed tears on his bed of arrows. He said: 'How astonishing! God Himself is the companion of the Pandava brothers, and still there is no end to their troubles and sorrows!' Who can ever understand the ways of God?

"A man thinks, 'I have practised a little prayer and austerity; so I have gained a victory over others.' But victory and defeat lie with God. I have seen a prostitute dying in the Ganges and retaining consciousness* to the end."

Mr. Choudhary: "How can one see God?"

(Note: Mr. Choudhary was inclined to Jnana Marg or path of Self Enquiry)

Sri Ramakrishna: "Not with these eyes. God gives one divine eyes; and only then can one behold Him. God gave Arjuna divine eves so that he might see His Universal Form. (An allusion to the eleventh chapter of the Bhagavad Gita).

"Your philosophy is mere speculation. It only reasons. God cannot be realized that way.

"God cannot remain unmoved if you have raga-bhakti, that is, love of God with passionate attachment to Him. Do you know how fond God is of His devotees' love? It is like the cow's fondness for fodder mixed with oil-cake. The cow gobbles it down greedily.

"Raga-bhakti is pure love of God, a love that seeks God alone and not any worldly end. Prahlada had it. Suppose you go to a wealthy man every day, but you seek no favour of him; you simply love to see him. If he wants to show you favour, you say: 'No, sir. I don't need anything. I came just to see you.' Such is love of God for its own sake. You simply love God and don't want anything from Him in return."

Saying this, the Sri Ramakrishna sang:

Though I am never loath to grant salvation,
I hesitate indeed to grant pure love.
Whoever wins pure love surpasses all;
He is adored by men;
He triumphs over the three worlds. . . .

He continued, "The gist of the whole thing is that one must develop passionate yearning for God and practise discrimination and renunciation." 

Mr. Choudhary: "Thakur ji (Sri Ramakrishna), is it not possible to have the vision of God without the help of a guru?"

Sri Ramakrishna: "Satchidananda Himself is the Guru. At the end of the sava-sadhana, just when the vision of the Ishta is about to take place, the guru appears before the aspirant and says to him, 'Behold! There is your Ishta.' Saying this, the guru merges in the Ishta. He who is the guru is also the Ishta. The guru is the thread that leads to God. Women perform a ritualistic worship known as the 'Ananta-vrata', the object of worship being the Infinite. But actually the Deity worshipped is Vishnu. In Him are the 'infinite' forms of God.

(To Ram and the other devotees) "If you ask me which form of God you should meditate upon, I should say: Fix your attention on that form which appeals to you most; but know for certain that all forms are the forms of one God alone.

"Never harbour malice toward anyone. Siva, Kali, and Hari are but different forms of that One. He is blessed indeed who has known all as one. 

Sri Ramakrishna sings a couplet:

Outwardly he appears as Siva's devotee,
But in his heart he worships Kali, the Blissful Mother,
And with his tongue he chants aloud Lord Hari's name.

"The body does not endure without a trace of lust, anger, and the like. You should try to reduce them to a minimum."

Looking at Kedar, the Master said: "He is very nice. He accepts both the Absolute and the Relative. He believes in Brahman, but he also accepts the gods and Divine Incarnations in human form."

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

Vedanta Saara - Sadanand Yogindra Saraswati - Part 4

$
0
0

पूर्व में हमने देखा की साधन-चतुष्टय संपन्न प्रमाता/अधिकारी जब विधि के अनुसार गुरु के पास जाता है तब वह गुरु उसपर परम-कृपा करके अध्यारोप-अपवाद की प्रक्रिया से वेदान्त उपदेश देते हैं।

यह आकांक्षा-पद्धाति कहलाती है - भगवद्गीता में भी भगवान श्रीकृष्ण नें इस का प्रयोग किया है। एक वाक्य कहा जाता है और वह वाक्य शिष्य के मन में स्वाभाविक प्रश्न को जन्म देता है। इस प्रश्न के उत्तर में एक और वाक्य बोला जायेगा जिसमें पुनः कोई नया शब्द प्रतिपादित किया जायेगा। जिससे एक और प्रश्न का जन्म होगा। इस प्रकार यह प्रक्रिया चलती है। शिष्य के प्रश्न को आकांक्षा कहते हैं। पूर्व श्लोक में अध्यारोप अपवाद प्रतिपादित किया था। शिष्य के मन में यह प्रश्न आयेगा – अध्यारोप अपवादः कः?

वेदान्त विचार अध्यारोप-अपवाद प्रक्रिया से किया जाता है। अतः इस प्रक्रिया को स्पष्ट रूप से समझना आवश्यक है।

पहले 'अध्यारोप'की परिभाषा बताते हैं और उसके समस्त विस्तार को बताने के बाद श्लोक १३७ में 'अपवाद'की परिभाषा बतायेंगें।

अध्यारोप


असर्पभूतायां रज्जौ सर्पारोपवत् वस्तुनि अवस्तुः आरोपः – अध्यारोप॥३२॥

अन्वयः– असर्पभूतायाम् रज्जौ सर्प-आरोपवत् वस्तुनि अवस्तुः आरोपः अध्यारोपः।

अन्वयार्थः– (असर्पभूतायाम्) ऐसी रस्सी जिसका स्वरूप किसी भी काल में सर्प नहीं है, (रज्जौ) उस रस्सी में (सर्प-आरोपवत्) सर्प के आरोप के समान ही (वस्तुनि) ब्रह्म में (अवस्तुः) संसार/नानात्व/माया का (आरोपः) आरोप (अध्यारोपः) अध्यारोप/अध्यास कहलाता है।

Adhyaropa is the superimposition of the unreal on the real, like the false perception of a snake in a rope which is not a snake.

यहां रज्जु और सर्प के उदाहरण से अध्यारोप बोधित किया है । प्रमुख बिन्दु यह है कि एक पदार्थ पर उससे विपरीत पदार्थ का आरोपण किया जाता है और इसको की बल देने के लिये "असर्पभूतायां"का प्रयोग किया है । वस्तु (जो की अवस्तु नहीं है) में अवस्तु का आरोप होता है । हमेशा सत् के ऊपर असत् का आरोप होता है । 

यहां पर सदसत् कि जगह वस्तु और अवस्तु का प्रयोग इसलिये कर रहे हैं क्योंकि श्लोक १६ में नित्य को ‘वस्तु’ कहकर संबोधित किया था ।

शंकराचार्य अध्यास की परिभाषा देते हुये ब्रह्मसूत्र में कहते हैं - "स्मृतिरूपः परत्र पूर्वदृष्टावभासः" (ब्र० सू० प्रस्तावना) - स्मृति रूप से अन्यत्र पहले देखी हुई वस्तु का अवभास ही अध्यास है।

इससे आकांक्षा होती है कि – वस्तु क्या है और अवस्तु क्या है । उसका निरुपण आगे किया है। 

वस्तु सच्चिदाननदमद्वयं ब्रह्म अज्ञानादि सकल जड समूहोऽवस्तु॥३३॥

अन्वयः– वस्तु सत्-चित्-आनन्द-अद्वयम् ब्रह्म; अज्ञान-आदि-सकल जड-समूहः अवस्तु।


अन्वयार्थः– (वस्तु) वस्तु कहते हैं (सत्-चित्-आनन्द) सत् चित् आनन्द स्वरूप (अद्वयम्) अद्वितीय (ब्रह्म) ब्रह्म को; तथा (अज्ञान-आदि-सकल जड-समूहः) अज्ञान आदि जो भी सकल जड पदार्थ हैं वह सब (अवस्तु) अवस्तु कहलाते हैं।

Reality is Brahman which is without a second and is Existence, Consciousness, and Bliss. Unreality is Nescience and all other material objects.

तत्त्वबोध में इसी सन्दर्भ में आता है - सत् किम्? कालत्रयेऽपि तिष्ठतीति सत्। चित् किम्? ज्ञानस्वरूपः। आनन्दः कः? सुखस्वरूपः।
सत् वह है जिसकी प्रतीति तीनों कालों (भूत वर्तमान और भविष्य) में है। किसी अन्य साधन के बिना स्वयं प्रकाशमान होता हुआ जो अन्य सभी पदार्थों का प्रकाशक हो वह चित् है। सुखस्वरूप आनन्द है।

वेदान्त में ‘वस्तु’ का अर्थ केवल ‘ब्रह्मन्’ होता है । वसति अस्ति वा इति वस्तु और केवल ब्रह्मन् ही "है" - नेह नानास्ति किञ्चन।

वस्तु के अलावा जो कुछ भी है वह अवस्तु है। अज्ञान आदि सकल जड़ समूह जो दिखता है यह सब अवस्तु है।सृष्टि में दो वस्तु (साधारण प्रयोग में) हैं – कार्यरूप और कारणरूप। प्रकृति कारणरुप है और यह सारा जगत रूप प्रपञ्च या सृष्टि कार्यरूप है। यह दोनों जड हैं। अन्तर केवल यह है कि प्रकृति अवक्त है और प्रपञ्च व्यक्त है। प्रकृति के स्थान पर अज्ञान शब्द का प्रयोग हुआ है। अज्ञान, अवस्तु, अविद्या, माया, प्रकृति, प्रपञ्च यह सब पर्यायवाची हैं।

जड वह है जो अपने आस्तित्व का बोध नहीं कर सकता अतः वह अचेतन है।

अब आकांक्षा होती है - कि अज्ञान क्या है? तो वह बताते हैं -


अज्ञानं तु – सदसद्भ्यामनिर्वचनीयं त्रिगुणात्मकं ज्ञानविरोधि भावरूपं यत् किञ्चिदिति वदन्ति अहमज्ञ इत्यादि अनुभवात् ‘देवात्मशक्तिं स्वगुणैः निगूढाम्’ (श्वेता. उ. १/३) इत्यादि श्रुतेश्च॥३४॥

अन्वयः– अज्ञानम् तु – सद् असद्भ्याम् अनिर्वचनीयम् त्रिगुणात्मकम् ज्ञानविरोधि भावरूपम् यत् किञ्चित् इति वदन्ति अहम् अज्ञः इत्यादि अनुभवात् ‘देवात्म-शक्तिं स्वगुणैः निगूढाम्’ (श्वेता. उ. १/३) इत्यादि श्रुतेः च।


अन्वयार्थः– (अज्ञानम् तु) किन्तु अज्ञानम् तो – (सद् असद्भ्याम्) सत् और असत् से भिन्न (अनिर्वचनीयम्) अनिर्वचनीय (त्रिगुणात्मकम्) तीन गुणों वाला, (ज्ञानविरोधि) ज्ञान का विरोधी, और (भावरूपम्) भावरूप है (यत् किञ्चित्) जो कोई भी या जब कोई (इति वदन्ति) ऐसा कहता है कि – (अहम् अज्ञः) “मैं नहीं जानता” (इत्यादि) इस प्रकार के वाक्यों से (अनुभवात्) अनुभव में आने वाला,  ‘(देवात्म-शक्तिं) दीप्तिमान् परमात्मा की शक्ति (स्वगुणैः) अपने ही गुणों से (निगूढाम्) छिपि हुई’ (इत्यादि) इस प्रकार की (श्रुतेः) श्रुतियों के द्वारा (च) भी जाना जाता है।

However, ignorance is described as something positive though intangible, which cannot be described either as being or non-being, which is made of three qualities and is antagonistic to Knowledge. Its existence is established from such experiences as “I am ignorant”, and from such Sruti passages as, “The power belonging to God Himself, hidden in its own qualities” (Svet. Up.I-3).

यहां पर अज्ञान को परिभाषित करते हैं। 
बुद्धि तभी समझ सकती है जब वस्तुओं (यहां 'वस्तु'शब्द का प्रयोग सामान्य बोलचाल भाषा वाला है) को उनके गुणों के अनुसार विभाजित करते हैं। Intellect can only understand things only when it is logically divided into different categories. It has to clearly divide things into different categories based on their properties and then analyze and understand it. We can see this in any field, biology has different categories - mammals, reptiles, cold-blodded warm-blodded plants, herbs shrubs, etc etc. Maths has random numbers, complex numbers, rational numbers etc. Chemistry has periodic table and everything is based on it. Astronomy has planets, stars, moons, black holes, galaxies etc.

अतः सृष्टि और ब्रह्म को समझाने के लिये अलग अलग दर्शनों में अलग अलग तरीके से विभाग किये गये हैं। अद्वैत वेदान्ती तीन विभाग करते हैं - 
  1. सत्
  2. असत्
  3. मिथ्या/अनिर्वचनीय/माया

पहले दो तो गीता में वर्णित है - 'नासतो विद्यते भावो नाभावो विद्यते सतः'। 

सत् वह है जिसका किसी भी काल में अभाव नहीं है जिसकी कभी भी अप्रतीति नहीं होती है जैसे - स्वयं का अनुभव। हमें अपने होने का अनुभव सदा रहता है।

असत् वह वस्तु है जिसका अनुभव या जिसकी प्रतीति कभी भी किसी भी काल में नही होती है जैसे गधे के सिर पर सींग। जो कभी भी नही था न है और न होगा। एक दूसरा प्रसिद्ध उदाहरण है वन्ध्यापुत्र - एक बांझ स्त्री का पुत्र।

अब यदि हम इस जगत का कोई उदाहरण लें जैसे हाथ की घड़ी - तो वह पहले नहीं थी (जब वह बनी थी उससे पहले वह नहीं थी) अभी वर्तमान में उसकी प्रतीति हो रही है, और वह भविष्य में नहीं होगी (यह हमारा अनुभव से अनुमान है कि वह कभी न कभी नष्ट होगी और उसके बाद उसकी प्रतीति नहीं होगी)। यह पूरा संसार इसके सब लोग सारे पदार्थ इस तरह ही हैं।
यह संसार सत् नहीं है क्योंकि इसके पदार्थ तीनों कालों में तो नहीं रहते हैं - सब कुछ कभी न कभी जन्मता या बनता है और कभी न कभी मृत्यु को प्राप्त होता है या नष्ट होता है। जिन वस्तुओं के बारे में अनुमान करने का सामर्थ्य हमारे भीतर नहीं है - जैसे यह पृथ्वी सूर्य चन्द्र अन्तरिक्ष आदि - उनके बारे में यह ज्ञान हमें शास्त्र से प्राप्त हो जाता है।
यह संसार असत् भी नहीं है क्योंकि इस संसार का अनुभव हमें वर्तमान में हो रहा है। हाथ की घड़ी भले भूत में न हो और भविष्य में न रहे पर वर्तमान में तो हमारी कलाई पर है। इसी प्रकार यह सारा जगत,लोग,पशु,पक्षी,वन,फूल आदि आदि सब वर्तमान में तो अनुभव में आ रहे हैं -  अतः यह असत् भी नहीं हैं।

हम यह भी नहीं कह सकते की यह सत् और असत् दोनों है क्योंकि कोई भी पदार्थ दोनों नहीं हो सकता।

इसी को अद्वैत वेदान्त में 'मिथ्या'या 'अनिर्वचनीय'कहते हैं, अनिर्वचनीय का अर्थ है - जिसके बारे में कुछ न कहा जा सके, जिसको परिभाषित न किया जा सके। अद्वैत वेदान्त का मिथ्या शब्द 'असत्'का पर्यायवाची नहीं है - जैसे की लोग समझते हैं - यह 'अनिर्वचनीय'का पर्यायवाची है। मिथ्या का अर्थ असत् नहीं है। मिथ्या का अर्थ है जिसकी प्रतीति अभी हो रही है पर वह नित्य नहीं है क्योंकि भूत और भविष्य में वह अप्रतीत है।

अतः अज्ञान/माया की परिभाषा है - "जिसको परिभाषित न किया जा सके"। जैसे किसी जादूगर का जादू हमको अनुभव में आता है हम उसे अपनी आंखों से देखते हैं पर उसके बारे में कुछ कह नहीं सकते की वह कैसे हुआ - यही अनिर्वचनीय है - और सबसे बड़ा जादूगर तो ईश्वर ही है - "मायावीव विजृम्भयत्यपि महायोगीव यः स्वेच्छया तस्मै श्रीगुरुमूर्तये नम इदं श्रीदक्षिणामूर्तये।"

अनिर्वचनीय को एक दूसरे ढंग से - वेदान्त के सर्प रज्जु से समझा जा सकता है - एक कम रोशनी वाले कमरे में रस्सी को देखकर सर्प का भ्रम हो गया और उसके कारण डर लगा। फिर किसी नें आकर रोशनी कर के दिखा दिया कि यह तो रस्सी है और भय दूर हो गया। अतः जो भय उत्पन्न हुआ वह रस्सी के 'अज्ञान'के कारण हुआ और रस्सी का 'ज्ञान'होते ही दूर हो गया। 
अब यह अज्ञान 'ज्ञान'से बाधित हो गया। यदि यह अज्ञान सत् होता तो कभी नष्ट नहीं हो सकता था क्योंकि सत् तो कभी नष्ट नहीं होता। यह अज्ञान असत् भी नहीं था क्योंकि यह था और उसके कारण भय भी उत्पन्न हुआ क्योंकि कोई वस्तु तो है ही नहीं वह कुछ प्रभाव नहीं डाल सकती - अतः कुछ तो था - और वह ज्ञान से नष्ट भी हो गया - इस को ही अनिर्वचनीय कहते हैं। यदि वह अज्ञान सत् होता तो कभी नष्ट नहीं होता और यदि असत् होता तो भय उत्पन्न नहीं करता और उसको नष्ट करने की आवश्यकता ही नहीं होती - अतः अनिर्वचनीय।

यह अज्ञान तीन गुणों से युक्त है - सत्त्व रजस् और तमस्।

इसलिये इसको ज्ञान विरोधीकहते हैं क्योंकि यह ज्ञान को सहन नहीं कर सकता यह ज्ञान से नष्ट हो जाता है बाधित हो जाता है।
यह 'अज्ञान'है और यह ज्ञान से बाधित भी हो जाता है इसलिये यह 'भावरूप'है। यदि यह अभावरूप होता तो कोई प्रयास करने की आवश्यकता ही नहीं होती क्योंकि जो है ही नहीं उसका नाश क्या करना।

अतः यह अज्ञान ज्ञान-विरोधी है और भावरूपंहै अर्थात यह ‘है’ और नाशवान है। इस अज्ञान का इतना सामर्थ्य है कि यह सकल प्रपञ्च उत्पन्न कर सकता है परन्तु इतना सामर्थ्यवान नहीं है कि यह सदा विद्यमान रह सके (सत् नहीं है)।

अब यह प्रश्न आता है कि इसका प्रमाण क्या है कि यह कुछ काल तक भावरूपं है। तो यहां पर दो प्रमाण दिये गये हैं – एक है स्व-अनुभव और दूसरा है श्रुति-
  1. व्यक्ति से अपने अनुभव से इसकी सत्ता प्रमाणित होती है - जैसे यदि किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति से (जिसको Russianभाषा नहीं आती है) पूछो कि - "क्या आपको Russianआती है?"तो वह कहेगा नहीं आती है। अतः उसको इस अज्ञान का अनुभव हो रहा है। यदि यह अज्ञान भावरूप न होता तो इसका अनुभव नहीं हो सकता था क्योंकि जो है ही नहीं उसका अनुभव कैसे हो सकता है। परन्तु व्यक्ति हो यह अनुभव होता है कि उसमें अज्ञान कै अतः यह भावरूप है। अतः साक्षी का अनुभव ही अज्ञान का प्रमाण है।
  2. देवात्मा (परब्रह्म) की शक्ति है यह मूल-अज्ञान/प्रकृति और यह अपने ही गुणों से (सत् रजस् तमस्) से छिपी हुई है – ऐसा श्वेता० उपनिषद श्रुति कहती है।


अव्यक्तनाम्नी परमेशशक्तिः अनादि अविद्या त्रिगुणात्मिका परा ।
कार्यानुमेया सुधियैव माया यया जगत्सर्वमिदं प्रसूयते ॥विवेक चूडामणि ११०॥

- यह परमेश्वर की शक्ति है, यह परा, त्रिगुणात्मिका, अनादि है। 'अव्यक्त''माया''अविद्या'आदि इसके नाम हैं। यह बुद्धिमान मनुष्यों के द्वारा अपने कार्य से (अनुमान से) जानी जाति है। इसने ही यह सारा जगत उत्पन्न किया है।
यह माया कारण रूप में अव्यक्त है और इस कार्यरूप सारे जगत को व्यक्त करती है। Matter can never be created nor can it be destroyed, it only converts from one form to another. All the Scientists in the world together cannot create even an ounce of matter. When matter is (looks like) destroyed it only converts to more subtler and unmanifest form.इस सृष्टि की, सूक्ष्मस्थूलशरीरों की कभी रचना नहीं होती यह अव्यक्त होते हैं और फिर व्यक्त हो जाते हैं फिर अव्यक्त होते हैं और फिर व्यक्त और यही सृष्टि क्रम चलता रहता है।

भगवद्गीता से कुछ श्लोक -
अव्यक्तादीनि भूतानि व्यक्तमध्यानि भारत । अव्यक्तनिधनान्येव तत्र का परिदेवना॥2.28॥
अव्यक्ताद्व्यक्तयः सर्वाः प्रभवन्त्यहरागमे। रात्र्यागमे प्रलीयन्ते तत्रैवाव्यक्तसंज्ञके॥8.18॥
भूतग्रामः स एवायं भूत्वा भूत्वा प्रलीयते। रात्र्यागमेऽवशः पार्थ प्रभवत्यहरागमे॥8.19॥
परस्तस्मात्तु भावोऽन्योऽव्यक्तोऽव्यक्तात्सनातनः। यः स सर्वेषु भूतेषु नश्यत्सु न विनश्यति॥8.20॥

सन्नाप्यसन्नप्युभयात्मिका नो भिन्नाप्यभिन्नाप्युभयात्मिका नो। 
सङ्गाप्यनङ्गाप्युभयात्मिका नो महाद्भुतानिर्वचनीयारूपा॥ विवेक चूडामणि १११॥

न यह सत् है न असत् है और न यह दोनों ही है। न यह ब्रह्म से भिन्न है न हि अभिन्न है और न यह दोनों ही है। न यह अंगसहित है और न यह अंगरहित है और न यह दोनों ही है। यह माया अन्यन्त अद्भुत् और अनिर्वचनीयरूपा है।

शुद्धाद्वयब्रह्मविबोधनाश्या सर्पभ्रमो रज्जुविवेकतो यथा। 
रजस्तमः सत्त्वमिति प्रसिद्धा गुणास्तदीयाः प्रथितैः स्वकार्यैः ॥विवेक चूडामणि ११२॥

रज्जु के ज्ञानसे सर्प भ्रम के समान वह अद्वितीय शुद्ध ब्रह्मके ज्ञानसे ही नष्ट होनेवाली है। अपने-अपने प्रसिद्ध कार्योंके कारण सत्त्व, रज और तम - ये उसके तीन गुण प्रसिद्ध हैं।



ॐ शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः॥
हरिः ॐ

Note:
The English commentary/translation is by Swami Nikhilanand (published by Advaita Ashrama).

Is assuming this world as illusion or unreal enough? Does it not contradict day-2-day experience?

$
0
0

Is assuming this world as illusion or unreal enough? Does it not contradict day-2-day experience?

In the process of neti-neti or as taught by bhagavAn in gItA chapter 13 that kshetra (field of observation, which is the world we live in or experience) is different from kshetraGYA (witness, observer known as sAkshI). There are various reasons why we must superimpose the unreality of this world firmly in our mind even though we experience this world and are affected by different situations we face in our life. Of-course, certain level of purity is necessary in order to be a witness. Just like water when mixed with milk becomes inseparable from milk, our consciousness is mixed i.e. strongly embedded, attached) to our mind, which in turn is strongly attached to 5 senses, which in turn rely on physical gross body. We must by any valid means separate this consciousness from mind, body and senses.

One way of doing it is to make our mind understand and agree that this world is unreal. This is not an assumption, but an affirmation. Affirmations are like auto suggestions which are used to marathon runners, psychiatrists, hypnotists and all those who work with subconscious mind. Suppose you have got fracture in hand. By repeatedly reminding or auto-suggesting your mind that 'I am healthy', 'my hand is healed', 'There is no more fracture in my hand', 'My hand is strong and healthy', 'I am completely healthy', etc. By daily repeating these instructions with calm mind, relaxed body, without any thoughts in background and without having any doubt on affirmation whether they will work or not, one recovers very fast. This happens when the prime thought in your mind becomes 'My hand is healed' and there is no contradictory thought of failure to recover. There is no fear at the back of mind while repeating affirmations. Affirmations also must be accompanied with bhAva or emotions. Just before you go to sleep, get into sleepy state. Then with relaxed body and mind repeat affirmation 3-4 times and go to sleep. It so happens that they may continue throughout night in subconscious mind. When there are no stray thoughts, mind is calm, and thoughts are said with strong faith, they enter into subconscious mind. Once they enter subconscious mind, subconscious mind will make sure that whatever has entered inside it gets executed. Subconscious mind does not do rational thinking, yet it has 90 % power as compared to the conscious mind which has just 10 % power. Hence subconscious mind over powers conscious mind and executes what was feeded to it without discriminating.

When any thought is repeated or any action is repeated, it becomes habit. Similarly, Self Enquiry or neti neti or OM chanting becomes habit and goes on spontaneously. In this way, one can stay connected with Brahman even if one is engrossed in work. Chanting goes on in subconscious mind. As soon as one becomes free, mantra re-enters conscious mind and continues by itself without any effort on our part. Similarly, the process of removing wrong belief that 'this world is real' or 'I am body' or I am mind or I am jIva (incarnated soul) can be removed by putting right belief in subconscious mind. Hence though we experience exactly opposite, we keep affirming that this world is unreal, I am not body, mind, intellect, ego or soul, I am Brahman, unchanging, immortal, unborn supreme reality.

Subconscious mind is the key to our spiritual progress. All questions like

Why and how to prayers work?
Why prayers does not work all time?
Why we get opposite to what we pray?
How can one heal oneself very fast in half of expected time?

etc, can be answered to taking subconscious mind into account

There are other practical reason for affirming that this world is unreal. Once you mentally accept that this world is unreal and temporary, you will make every effort to remain conscious, not to get pulled into it. Mind which is supposed to control 5 senses has become their slave. Senses are directed extrovert. One sees anything when light projects on retina, is projected to brain as an inverted image. However, according to shAstra-s mind travels along with senses or via senses to the object, feels it and then infers a meaningful suggestion to it. Remember that mind and brain are different. So we must make efforts to stop mind running behind senses and its hunting for worldly object. Pull it backwards and make it stable. Then make this introvert mind merge into it's source which is Brahman. Mind itself does not have any power. It is jada (gross). Like moon it reflects the power of Atman or Brahman. When mind moves towards it's source, it merges in it. Hence in order to create dispassion we must cultivate in our mind very firmly that this world is unreal. But developing just dispassion is not enough. We need to surrender ourselves to Ishvara or Brahman and pray to take us beyond mAyA. Since one disassociates oneself from sense objects, body, mind, ego and intellect by practising dispassion, surrender to Ishvara and by being witness, this path is called as 'path of negation' by it 'neti-neti' or 'Self Enquiry'. Even by chanting OM, one is technically doing neti-neti, as one is separating or dis-associating 'I' or 'Self' (kshetraGYA) from all that is non-self (kshetra). Mind focusses on OM and later on, it searches for the origin of OM and merge in it. Origin of OM, which is turiyA avasthA or peace is nothing but Brahman.

When one becomes a witness, one gets separated from the objection of observation. When one gets attracted or associates oneself with any object, one becomes fused with it, mixes with it and considers oneself to be non-different from the object. We all unknowingly accept ourselves as 'body'. Accepting unreality and temporary nature of world helps us becomes witness to it and not get attached to it. Staying as witness increases our awareness as a separate entity then object of observation. Finally one separates from mind-body-intellect-ego-soul complex and becomes aware of non-dual Brahman. But to be a witness, mind has to stop longing for sense objects. Hence establishing unreality of this world is necessary.

We understand that there is no assumption of being 'Brahman'. Just assuming does not make one 'Brahman'. One has to realise one's true nature. Hence 'I am Brahman' or 'Brahman satya, jagat mithyA' is not just assumption, but a process of 'neti-neti' or 'the path of negation'.

Sri Ramana Maharshi Stressing on Need of Practice than Mere Speculation

$
0
0
The following dialogue is characteristic as showing refusal to discuss theory and insistence on the need for practice.

Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi (B): God is always the first person, the I, ever standing before you. Because you give precedence to worldly things, God appears to have receded to the background. If you give up all else and seek Him alone, He will remain as the ‘I’, the Self.
Devotee (D): The final state of Realisation is said, according to Advaita, to be absolute union with the Divine, and according to Visishtadvaita a qualified union, while Dvaita maintains that there is no union at all. Which of these should be considered the correct view?

B.: Why speculate about what will happen at some time in the future? All are agreed that the ‘I’ exists. To whichever school of thought he may belong, let the earnest seeker first find out what the ‘I’ is. Then it will be time enough to know what the final state will be, whether the ‘I’ will get merged in the Supreme Being or stand apart from Him. Let us not forestall the conclusion, but keep an open mind.

D.: But will not some understanding of the final state be a helpful guide even to the aspirant?

B.: No purpose is served by trying to decide now what the final state of Realisation will be. It has no intrinsic value.

D.: Why not?

B.: Because you proceed on a wrong principle. Your conclusion is arrived at by the intellect which shines only by the light it derives from the Self. Is it not presumptuous on the part of the intellect to sit in judgement over that from which it derives its little light? How can the intellect, which can never reach the Self, be competent to ascertain and much less decide the nature of the final state of Realisation? It is like trying to measure the sunlight at its source by the standard of the light given by a candle. The wax will melt down before the candle comes anywhere near the sun. Instead of indulging in mere speculation, devote yourself here and now to the search for the Truth that is ever within you.

Source: Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi in his own words – Arthur Osborne

Guru Pūrṇimā kī hārdika śubhakāmanāye - 19th July 2016

$
0
0



|| Srī Guru Saraṇam||

|| tanno hamsa prachodayāt ||

|| jnānadev tu kaivalyam ||


Praṇām-s,

This year Guru Purnima is celebrated on 19.7.2016. Wishing you all a Happy Guru Purnima. May The grace of Guru be always upon us, may we always humbly accept his instructions and never oppose them. May we all realise the supreme truth.

विदिताखिलशास्त्रसुधाजलधे   महितोपनिषत्  कथितार्थनिधे 

हृदये  कलये विमलं चरणं भव  शंकर  देशिक  मे  शरणम्  ॥ 
                                                         - तोटकाष्टकं -1



O Thou, The Knower Of All The Milk-Ocean Of Scriptures! The Expounder Of The Topics Of Great Upanisadic Treasure-Trove! On Thy Faultless Feet I Meditate In My Heart. Be Thou My Refuge O preceptor, Sankara. I meditate on Your pure lotus feet in my heart | O Preceptor Shankara, be my refuge.
- toTakAShTaka.m - 1

Please find some old posts related to Guru



Posts on Adi Śankarāchārya jī

Adi Shankaracharya Jayanti, 4th May 2014
(contains links to Guru Paduka Stotram, Guru Asktakam and Dakshinamurty Stotram


Other Lesser known posts



|| Hari OM ||

Introduction of Madhusūdana Sarasvatī’s Gūḍārtha Dīpikā, a unique commentary on Bhagavad Gītā

$
0
0


Update: 01/08/2016. Verses 8 and 9 are corrected. 'Thou' is correctly translated to 'tvam' and 'that' to 'tat'.

Intro of Madhusūdana Sarasvatī’s Gūḍārtha Dīpikā, a commentary on Bhagavad Gītā



Short intro about the author Madhusūdan Sarasvatī


Madhusūdan Sarasvatī (MS) is a well known, celebrated and respected name in the dvaita-advaita debates. MS was a great Kṛṣṇa bhakta and an ardent Advaitin. MS combined Bhakti and Jñāna for common man. MS is also credited to create a military monk organization or martial monk otraining centers known as Nāgā Sādhu akhārā-s in order to save Hindus and Pundits from persecution of Muslim clerics. MS has written many popular works defending Advaita and giving clarity on advaita concepts Few of his works are advaita-siddhi, siddhanta-bindu, bhakti-rasāyaṇa, Sivamanimna stotra-ṭikā and the celebrated commentary on Gītā known as Guḍhārtha Dīpikā. Dīpikā means annotations on the original verse or commentary. His commentary is considered unique and close to original meaning, nothighly influenced by any other āchārya or taking concepts from a pūrvāchārya. MS in the beginning of intro of Gītā Bhāshya salutes Ādi Śankarāchārya jī in most reverential terms and declares that only after thoroughly studying āchārya’s (Ādi Śankara’s) bhāshya, he has composed his Dīpikā. MD has virtually explained every word of Gītā. Most of the explanations that we hear from the discourses on Gīta done with monks following Advaita tradition are influenced by MS’s works. Introduction to Gītā is very important and clearsmany doubts, gives clarity about the spiritual path as taught in Gītā. Hence it is very important to read, understand and digest his introduction. To me, this introduction is an essence of Gītā. 




Further Information about MS can be found by reading ‘Bhagavad Gītā with Annotation of Madhusūdan Sarasvatī’s Gudhārtha Dīpikā’by Swami Gambhirananda of Ramakrishna Math or by visitng following links






Note:In the beginning, sanskrit words in shown in italics for easy identification and reading. Later on, they may not be shown in italics, as reader is expected to be well acquinted with them.



|| Hari OM ||



|| Śrī Kṛṣṇa Parabrahmāpaṇamastu ||




Invocation:



OM ! Salutation to Rāmachandra who is possessed of divine qualities, the nectar - in the form of Consciousness - issuing from whose lotus-feet is enjoyed by the monks of the highest class (parama-haṁsa-s), and who resides in the minds of devotees.



Introduction:



1. After having assiduosly delibrated on the meaning of the Commentary of the venerable one (Śrī Ādi Śankarāchārya jī), I write this elucidation, called Gūdhārtha-Dīpikā (Exposition of the Subtle meanings), of almost every word of the Gītā.



2. It has been said that the purpose of the scripture Gītā is absolute Liberation, which consists in the complete cessation of transmigration together with its causes.



3. That is the supreme state of Viṣṇu which is identical with absolute Existence-Knowledge-Bliss (sat-chit-ānada), for the attainment of which the Veda-s, consisting of three parts, have commenced.



4. The three parts succesfully stand for rites, meditation and enlightenment. In confirmity with them, the Gītā, consisting of eighteen chapters, has three sections.



5. Here (in the Gītā) each section of six (chapters) should be understood as referring to one part (of the Veda-s). Karma, i.e. Steadfastness in Action (rites and duties) and Jñānai.e. steadfast in Knowledge are taught in the first and the last (sections).



6. Since the two cannot be combined because of their extreme opposition, therefore bhakti i.e. steadfastness in devotion to the Lord has been declared in the middle.



7. As that devotion is inherent in both of them, therefore it removes all the obstacles. That (devotion) is of three kinds – mixed with rites, pure, and mixed with Knowledge.



8. There again, in the first section, the pure Self meant by the word ‘thou’ i.e. ‘tat’ (in ‘Thou are That’, ‘tat tvam asi’ Ch. 6.8.6) is ascertained rationally through the Path of Action and its renunciation.



9. In the second (section), by way of describing steadfastness in devotion to God, is ascertained the meaning of the word ‘That’ i.e. ‘tvam’ as the Lord who is supreme Bliss.



10. And in the third is presented clearly the meaning of the sentence (‘Thou art That’ ‘Tat tvam asi’) as the identity of the two. Thus, here (in the Gītā) also there is an interconnection among the (three) sections.



11. The speciality of each chapter, however, will be spoken of in the respective dchapters themselves. These (following) steps in the disciplines for the Liberation are being presented as the purpose of the scripture (Gītā).



12. (The first step is) the performance of selfless work (niṣkāma-karma)by rejecting rites and duties meant for personal gain (kāmya-karma)and the prohibited actions (niṣiddha-karma). There again, the highest merit lies in repeating the name (japa) of and praising (the Lord) Hari.





13. When after the dissipation of sins from the mind it becomes fit for discrimination, then there arises a firm discrimination between the permanent and the transient.



14. Gradually follows detachment from things here or here-after, called vaśīkāra[1] (vairāgya, detachment, dispassion) (complete control over the mind and the organs). Then, through the perfection of śama (curbing or controlling mind) etc.,[2]renunciation becomes fully established.[3]



[1] Vairāgya, detachment, is of two kinds, para (superior) and apara (inferior). The later is classified under four heads - yatamāna, vyatireka, ekendriya and vaśīkāra.



[2] Four qualities or purushārtha-s as mentioned in Viveka Chūḍāmaṇi are

  1. Viveka – discrimination between real and unreal, nitya and anitya
  2. Vairāgya – dispassion obtained through proper understanding or discrimination i.e. viveka
  3. Ṣaṭ-sampatti – six qualities śama, dama, uparati, titikṣā and shraddhā, samādhāna
    1. śama – restrain or control of mind i.e. control over thoughts and emotions
    2. dama – restrain of sense organs – seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling and tasting. One knows any objects using five senses.
    3. uparati – Reaching a saturation point i.e. getting tired of mind running behind sense objects or peace and happiness. Keeping mind and sensing under control and not let them drift them back to sense objects.
    4. titikṣā – endurance, to stay neutral with likes and dislikes.
    5. śraddhā – Faith (in yourself, guru, Īśvara and śāstra-s).
    6. samādhāna – concentration of mind. To stay focussed on goal and be satisfied in communion with Brahman or Īśvara. Never let youself get astray from your goal.
  4. mumukṣutva – Burning desire for Liberation.





[3] A different reading is sannyāse niṣṭhito bhavet: one shold become fully established in renunciation.



15. Thus, from the renunciation of all things springs the firm hankering for Liberation. From that follows approaching a teacher, and from that the receiving of instructions.



16. Thereafter follows śravaṇa (hearing and understanding of Vedānta) etc for the elimination of doubt. In this matter the whole of the Uttara-mimāṁsā (Vedānta) scripture becomes useful.



17. Thereafter, through the perfection of that follows nidhidhyāsana(profound meditation, comtemplation-nidhidhyāsana is not dhyāna). The whole of the Yoga scripture, indeed gets its purpose fulfilled at this stage.



18. As a result, when the mind becomes freed from all the defects there arises the Knowledge of Reality from (hearing) the (Upaniṣadic) sentence (‘Thou art That’ i.e. ‘tat tvam asi’). From the word (of the Upaniṣad) itself springs Unitive Vision (i.e. immediate Knowledge of the identity of Brahman and the Self).



19. As for the complete eradication of neiscence (ajñāna), that occurs on the rise of the Knowledge of Reality (tatva-jñāna). Then, when the covering or veil of neiscence (ajñāna) is removed, error an doubt become dispelled.



20. Through the power of the Knowledge of Reality (tattva-jñāna)the results of actions (done in past lives) (karma-phala), that have not commenced bearing fruit (anārabdha or saṅchita karma [4]) get wholly descriyed, to be sure, and the results of actions (done in the present life after after the dawn of Knowledge) that are to bear fruit in the future (āgāmīnī or āgāmī karma [4]) do not accure.



21. But, because of the disturbance created by the results of actions that have started bearing fruit (prārabhdha [4]), vāsanā (past impression, dissatisfied desire) does not get destroyed. That is eliminated through saṁyama (meaning explained in next verse) the strongest of all (the disciplines).





[4] sañchita-karma: karma done in past lives stored in mind. (ref BG 2.55)

sañchita-karma-phala: fruits of sañchita karma



prārabhdha-karma: karma in past lives, whose fruits is to be bored in this life. A person takes birth to pass through the fruits of prārabhdha karma.



āgāmī-karma: karma done in present life, whose fruits are yet to materialize. In case of jñānī, āgāmī karma does not arise at all, as a jñānī does not do sakāma karma i.e. his karma are not a reaction to any situation, but extinguishing of prārabhdha karma. Work done by jñānī does not yield any result as a jñānī is a witness and not a doer, he does not have to suffer to fruits of karma anymore.




22. The five disciplines, viz. Yama (restraint), etc. (P.Y.Sū 2.29) [5], practised before become conducive to that saṁyama, which is the triad consisting of dhāraṇā (concentration), dhyāna (meditation), and samādhi (absorption, merging in Brahman). (See P.Y.Ṣū 3.1-4)



[5] In Patanjali Yoga Sūtra-s P.Y.Sū 2.29, eight disciplines or limbs are mentioned mentioned. Amongst eight, first five involve physical activity. This means they are of external nature, while rest three (dhāraṇā, dhyāna and samādhi) are purely mental. Hence last three are of internal or mental nature. Five restrains or disciplines are basic foundation pillars upon which later three rests. Amongst these five, the first one Yama (restrain) is very importance and first one to be practised. There are five types of restrains are mentioned in Interestingly, these five fundamental disciplines are commented on by the great Maharṣhi Veda Vyāsa in his commentary on P.Y.Sū 3.30. In later verse P.Y.Sū 3.32 five niyama-s (observences) are mentioned. In other verses in this chapter, explanation related to these 8 disciplines are further elucidated. All explanations are adapted from Bhagavān Veda Vyāsa commentary on P.Y.Sūtra-s. When not quoted, certain parts of explanation are adopted.



Eight disciplines or puruśārtha-s are

  1. Yama – Five restraints. Five restrains as mentioned in P.Y.Sū 2.29 are -
    1. Ahiṁsā – Non-violence. Absention from harming others even mentally. Benovelence. Bhagavān Veda Vyāsa says - “Benovelence consists in frēdom from ill-will against all beings at all times and in all ways”.
    2. Satya – Truthfulness. Bhagavān Veda Vyāsa says - “Truthfulness consists in thought and speech being in strict accord with the reality of things; that is to say, what one thinks and speaks is in strict accordance with what he has actually perceived or inferred or heard. Speech is used for conveing one’s own knowledge to others; if then, this speech is not deceptive or mistaken or unintelligible, (then it is ‘truthful’); but it is so only when it is used for benefiting all living beings, not when it is used for injuring them”.
    3. Asteya – Non-Stealing. Abstinence from false-hood, inappropriation. Obtaining things in a manner not sanctioned in scriptures.
    4. Brahmacharya – Chastity, Celebacy, sexual restrain.
    5. Aparigrahāḥ – Restrain of or Freedom from Greed, Avarice. Bhagavān Veda Vyāsa says - “Freedom from Avarice consists in not seeking to acquire things. - on account of realising the fact that such acquisition is beset with evils involved in the acquisition, protection and destruction of the things, attachment to them and ill-will (against rivals).
  2. Niyama – Five Observances. Five observances as mentioned in P.Y.Sū 3.32 are-
    1. Śaucha - Cleanliness. Cleanliness is external and internal. External involves cleaning physical body with soap, clay water, etc and cleaning internal body parts by various kriya-s like nauli, etc or by de-toxification procedures. While internal consists of purifying mind or discarding impurities of mind.
    2. Santoṣa – Contentment, Satisfaction. “Contention consists of not desiring to obtain anything more than one has already got” - says Bhagavān Veda Vyāsa.
    3. Tapaḥ – Austerity, intense effort, constant practice. ‘Suffering pair of opposites’ like -hunger and thirst, heat and cold, sitting and standing, etc. Austerityalso includes passing through fasting penances like chāndrāyaṇa says Bhagavān Veda Vyāsa. As per Sri Ramana Maharshi, tapa is to merge (laya of mind) in the origin of mantra.
    4. Svādhyāya – Self-Study. Bhagavān Veda Vyāsa says - “Reading scriptures dealing with Liberation and repeating of praṇava mantra OM”
    5. Īṣvara-praṇidhāna – Worship of Īṣvara or Self Surrender. Devotion to God.
  3. Āsana – postures. Postures help strengthen body and make it fit to sit for long hours in meditation. They also help kēp body healthy.
  4. Prāṇāyama – Control of prāṇa by will or by controlling breath (breath regulation).
  5. Pratyāhāra – Withdrawal of the mind from sense objects. Abstraction.
  6. Dhāraṇā - Concentration. Concentrate on prāṇa, kuṇḍalini or mantra or form of Īśvara (Īshvara) with goal to unite prāṇa, kuṇḍalini with paramātmā or merge in the origin of mantra or form of Īśvara.
  7. Dhyāna – Meditation on the supreme Brahman or Paramātmā.
  8. Samādhi – Adsorption in Brahman / Ātman / Paramātmān / Īshvara tatva




23. However, absorption (samāhi) is quickly accomplished through special devotion of God. From that follows mano-nāśa (desctruction of mind) and vāsanā-kṣaya (destruction or dissipation of past impressions, desires).



24. Tatva-jñāna (Knowledge of Reality), mano-nāśa(desctruction of mind) and vāsanā-kṣaya (destruction or dissipation of past impressions, desires) -when these three are practised together. Liberation while still alive (jīvanmukti)becomes firm.



25. Total renunciation of all actions as a results of enlightenment (vidvat-sanyāsa) is mentioned in the Upaniṣad-s for this purpose - that there may be effort for comtemplating that very part (among those three) which remained incomplete before.



26. When the mind is first held back fully from fluctiations by means of savikalpa-samādhi, there occurs in it the nirvikalpa-samādhi[6], which has three levels.



[6] Savikapla-samādhi is a state of consciousness where one is aware of distinction of knower of unity of God and devotee.



Nirvikapla-samādhi transcends this feeling and none other that Atman or Brahman exists.



27. In the first the person awakes (from nirvikapla-samādhi) by himself, (and) in the second he is awakened by others. In the last he is does not awake at all; he remains ever absorbed in it.



28. He who has become such a Brāhmaṇa(knower of Brahman) is the foremost amongst the expounders of Vedānta. He is spoken of as having gone beyond guṇa-s, a man of steady Wisdom (sthita-prajña), and a devotee of Viṣṇu.



29. (He is) also (called) a transcender of the castes and stages of life, one who is liberated while still alove (jīvanmukta), and a delighter (only) in the Self. The scriptures keep away from such a person because of his being self-fulfilled.



30-31. On the authority of the Upaniṣadic text, ‘He who has supreme devotion to Īshvara(God), and equal devotion to the guru, to him, indeed, to the great-souled one (pure-souled one), these sibject-matters that have been spoken of become revealed’ (Śv. Up. 6.23) etc., it follows that devotion to Īshvara(God) with body, mind and speech, under all conditions, becomes useful in this context.



32. The devotion cultivated in the preceding stage leads to the next stage. Otherwise, attainment of success is very difficult owing to the abundance of obstacles.



33. And there are the words of Hari: ‘Verily, by that past habit itself he is carried forward, even in spite of himself!’, ‘...attaining perfection through many births, (thereby achieves the highest Goal)’ ( B.G. 6.44-45, etc)



34-35. If, however, owing to the unpredictability of the impressions acquired earlier (in past lives) i.e. (vāsanā-s of past lives, as a result of meritious sachita-karma-phala), someone becomes self-fulfilled in the beginning itself, like the dropping of a fruit from the sky, then the scriptures cannot be accepted as having been promulgated for him, because they have already served their purpose. The grace of God that descends as a concequence of persistence in the disciplines that were perfected in the previous lives is inscrutable!



36. Although the preceding stage is thus acquired, devotion to Īshvara (God), should still be cultivated for later stages. They cannot be attained without that (devotion).



37. But in the state of being liberated while still alive, (jīvanmukti), no ‘result of devotion’ is to be imagined: Adoring Hariis natural to them, like their being devoid of hate, etc.



38. Such is the greatness of Hari (Viṣṇu) that, though free from bondage, the sages, who delight (only) in the Self, render spontaneous devotion to Viṣṇu (Bhāgavat Purāṇa - B.P 1.7.10.)



39. According to the verse (of Gītā), ‘Of them the man of Knowledge (jñānī) excels since he is endowned with constant steadfastness and onepointed devotion’, etc (B.G. 7.17), this one who is full of loving devotion is declared to be the highest (best amonst all four types of devotees).



40. All this has been revealed by the Lord in the scripture Gītā. Therefore my mind is intensely eager to explain this scripture (śāstra) i.e. Gītā.



41-42. Performance of selfless work (niṣkāma-karma) is declared to be the root cause of Liberation, and the hinderances to it are the demonical sins such as sorrow etc, from which follow deviation from one’s natural duty, recourse to what is prohibited, or action performed with selfish motive or egoism.



43. Being thus ever under the influence of the demonical sins, a person becomes unfit for gaining the human Goal and suffers a series of afflictions (pain).



44. Pain is naturally repulsive to all the living beings in this world. Therefore sorrow, delusion, etc., which are its (pain’s) causes, should always be shunned.



45-46. The Lord has uttered this most esteemed Scripture with a view to enlightening a person who, being filled with this desire to know the means of eradicating sorrow, delusion, etc, which are inherent in the beginningless chain of mundane existence, and which are the causes of affliction and difficult to be got rid of, has become eager to attain the highest human Goal (puruṣārtha)
 



|| Śrī Kṛṣṇa Parabrahmārpaṇamastu ||



|| Hari OM ||






Source and Credits: 



1) ‘Bhagavad Gītā with Annotation of Madhusūdan Sarasvatī’s Gudhārtha Dīpikā’by Swami Gambhirananda of Ramakrishna Math

2) Patanjali Yoga Sutras - Swami Prabhavananda of Ramakrishna Mission
3) Yoga Darshan - Sutras of Patanjali with Bhashya of Vyasa - Ganganath Jha
4) Kriya Yoga Sutras of Patanjali and the Siddhas - Marshall Govindan

How does one progress spiritually (on the path of Jñāna)?

$
0
0
|| Hari OM ||
 
While veda-s teach us performing rites and rituals, Gītā teaches us to renounce them. What should we do? How does one progress spiritually?

As per Gītā, there are two ways - path of action (karma kāṇḍa) and path of renunciation (Jñāna mārga). While first portion of veda-s prescribe rites and rituals which is a part of karma kāṇḍa, last portion or better the essence of veda-s is known as vedānta (upaniṣad-s). Performing one’s duties, living a moral and ethical life, civil codes (laws), āchāra, vichāra, vyavahāra (conduct), etc, is prescribed in dharma smriti-s. In this section, we will discuss about Jñāna mārga.

Gītā is an essence of vedānta. Gītā is a moksha śāstra and not a dharma śāstra. Hence renunciation of karma kāṇḍa and agnī is recommended. karma kāṇḍa is said to be kāmya karma, hence a sanyāsī has to renounce ajnī i.e. yajña, havan, not even for the well being for society.

However, we are all attached with our body, mind and ego. Hence knowingly or unknowingly whatever karma we do, happens to be kāmya or sakāma karma. Hence our journey is to move from sakāma to niśkāma bhāva.

IMHO, There are three ways to progress spiritually on the path of jñāna.

1. Surrender all work and it's fruits to Īśvara. (karma and karma phala). When one surrenders karma phala, karma is automatically surrendered to Īśvara.

2. Do all karma for Īśvara and not for anybody else. Here one believes oneself to be a blessed instrument of Īśvara.

3. Do karma with sākshī (sāxī) bhāva i.e. by being a witness.

As I understand, these are the reasons for 3 types of approaches while doing karma.

1. When we say that we have 'surrendered' or 'offered' all our karma and it's phala to Īśvara, it has a pre-condition. The word 'surrender' or 'offer' can only be possible if we have something to 'surrender' or 'offer'. We can only give what we have. It means that we possess something and are willing to give. this implies there is an attachment with what we have done and it's results. Hence there is 'mama bhāva'. With 'mama bhāva', there is 'aham bhāva'. This 'I-ness' or 'mine-ness' is that which should be offered. This 'I-ness' or 'mine-ness' is our attachment with karma. Hence along with offering of karma or karma phala, our attachment to it also gets fade away. With repeated surrender with strong bhāva, comes humility and faith in Īśvara. 'I-ness' and 'Mine-ness' fades away. In this way we proceed from sakāma to niśkāma karma.

2. Whatever we do, kēp Īśvara in center or say kēp Īśvara in between work and you. For example when you are helping someone condition your mind such that, in reality, one one can help anyone except Īśvara. Hence I am not doing any favour by helping him. On the other hand, feel blessed and recipient of grace of Īśvara that he has chosen to work through you. In this way, you will not get attached to the one whom you are helping, but will remain humble. Likewise, when helped by someone, though for practical purposes you are obliged to say 'Thank you', in reality know that, 'It is Īśvara who has helped me through him'. Hence there will not be any dependency upon a person, nor will be a feeling of being 'under debt'. In either cases, our faith in Īśvara will increase and since we have already surrendered to Īśvara, by his grace, work will be niśkāma. As our faith and surrender in him increases, we will move from sakāma to niśkāma karma.

3. Being sākshī is very difficult. This last way is for the ones whose consciousness is loosely bound to body. During meditation, they can separate themselves from the thoughts, emotions, ego and physical body. In this path, one abides in jñāna sthiti, stays we a witness and then do all work. This state is difficult to explain. Even while talking, one feels separateness or a kind of detachment. When the work is over, mind effortlessly turns introvert. Even in neti-neti, one has to abide in the state of jñāna and then be a witness and negate whatever is non-Self i.e. anātmā. In case of such a blessed soul, s/he is not much attached while doing work, just like we are not totally conscious while driving. We talk, think, sing or listen while driving, still we change gears, apply brakes, overtake vehicles or down speed to let others overtake you. All these krīyā-s happen without paying special attention. In the same most work can be done in this way. In Sri Ramakrishna's words, "While doing work, keep one hand in God and another in work When work is finished, keep both hands in God". Even when one does work with full concentration, the mantra or the feeling of being brahman, which is consciousness, persists in subconscious mind. After work gets done, mantra or feeling of being a witness comes to conscious mind (jāgrata mana). Hence there are no more thoughts on the topic which was finished few moments ago. In this way the one stays 'in presence', does not think of past. So such a man never thinks of any unsolved problem after leaving the place. For example, after we leave from office, no thought about pending work comes in mind.

For this to happen, Īśvara kṛpā (Kripā), guru's kṛpā are necessary. Equally important is that the only goal of Life is 'moksha'. Moksha is the primary and the only goal and one is ready to renounce anything for the sake of this goal. 4 qualities like viveka, vairāgya, ṣaṭasampatti, mumukshutva have to be cultivated and has to be present in much more percentage then in neophyte.

Hence practice either 1st or 2nd approach. Diligent practice will open doors for 3rd approach. Also remember that when one wants to achieve anything or is not ready to renounce any desire or object, one has to follow rules of karma kāṇḍa.Hence dharma is to be carried our in a scripturally prescribed way. But when one wants to leave anything, there is no discipline or step by step procedure. When shifting from old house to new house, we step into new house at an auspicious moment (śubha muhurat), but do we care much about leaving old house in auspicious moment? to leave anything, or renounce anything from our mind i.e. remove attachment of anything, there is no need of waiting for muhurat or help of friends or family members. It's all up to you. It's inside your mind. Hence none but you can help you. If none can help you, none can obstruct your path to moksha, except your own mind.

Awakening and meditating during brahma muhurata, etc is prescribed even for sanyāsīn-s as though one is a renunciate, one has not risen above māyā. When one is still under the influence of māyā and so prakṛti, one has to be in tune with nature and take advantage of sātvika vātāravaṇa, as there are no worldly thoughts before Sunrise. After day-2-day activity begins (which begins after sunrise), worldly thoughts begin to float in atmosphere and efficiency and quality of meditation is reduced.

There is one more way of progressing spiritually. It is the path of yoga. It is to control the mind. abhyāsa and vairāgya are two wings that one needs to fly. Do dośa darśana in samsāra to develop vairāgya. abhyāsa is to practice dośa darśana daily, read scriptures, attend discourses dealing with moksha, stay in presence of a guru and meditate sincerely.

This while process is explained in Madhusūdan Sarasvatī in his Gītā commentary Guḍhārtha Dīpikā in chapter 6, specially in 6.15 and 6.35 where he quotes Patanjalī Yoga Sūtra 1.15, 1.13, etc, along wtih Vyāsa Bhāśya. Hence it's study is also required. Bhagavān Vyāsa's commentary is not easy to understand. It adds many new terminology which is not found in vedānta or in prakaraṇa grantha-s. This makes it difficult to understand and explain yogic way of spiritual progress. If you are interested in exploring depths and are interested in yogic approach and control mind, it is worth reading, else stick to 3 ways and develop vairāgya. Sant Jñānadeva's commentary on chapter six is also considered important. Important thing to remember is that we must always keep moksha as only goal of life to succeed.
 
|| Hari OM ||

Prayer to Lord Ganesha

$
0
0
On the auspicious occasion of gaNesha chaturthi on 5th Sept 2016, let us pray to Lord Ganesha
 

|| ॐ श्री गणेशाय नमः ||

|| Om shrI gaNeshAya namaH ||




May Lord gaNesha, by whose grace, auspicious muhurata becomes auspicious, grant us intelligence, the discriminative power (viveka), as taught by veda-s.

O gaNesha, bless us with AtmA-anAtmA-viveka. Let the right logic guide us on spiritual path and not contrary to it.

o gaNesha, grant us vairAgya, which, along with viveka makes abhyAsa and meditation easy.

O gaNesha, we pray to you, who resides in the mulAdhAra, from where our spiritual journey begins, to direct the prANa (energy) of this chakra from material obsession, to spiritual progress.

O gaNesha, those who do not find any need to control their lower three chakra-s, and thik they can directly activate anAhata by chanting the holy names of Ishvara, let them know that there is no way for them to ignore controlling lower chakra-s, which needs thy grace.

o gaNesha, let them know that lower chakra-s are the base of spirituality and can be regulated by right dhArmika conduct and by thy grace. Neglecting them, is dangerous, as spirituality without the dharmic base, can be anything, but not spirituality. It becomes center of ego, and an opportunity of fulfilling vested interest. May you guide us properly on our spiritual path that best suits us and that we are capable of.

O gaNesha, give us initiation into spirituality, as without thy grace, nothing can be started, nothing started without grace can be fruitful.

O gaNesha, grant us the nature of thy elephant form, curiosity, the curiosity to know thy Brahman

O gaNesha, grant us the quality of being ever alert and remove laziness and procrastination.

O gaNesha, please grant us the quality of thy trunk, which is strong, flexible, and sensitive.

O gaNesha, please grace us with the quality of alertness and constant focus on Brahman, which is depicted in your eyes,

O gaNesha, grace us with the quality of thy ears, receptivity. Make us receptive to spiritual teachings and hearing the inner voice, as they are necessary for a disciple and spiritual progress.

O gaNesha, grace us with the quality of thy big belly, which is capable to digest the teachings of Atma-vidyA that the sages and gurus teach.

O gaNesha, thou residing in mUlAdhAra, no work can be accomplished if mUlAdhAra is not activated by thy grace. Please grant us thy blessings and direct all our actions towards you, the unborn, of the nature of praNava, the only creator, preserver and destroyer of the world.

O gaNesha grant us riddhi (success, accomplishment), on the spiritual path. May we, at all times, remain focused on Brahman.

O gaNesha, bless us so that our heart always longs for Brahman, as longing is the means to realise Brahman. Bless us riddhi (success) in longing.

O gaNesha, grant us dhyAna siddhi
grant us, Asana siddhi
grant us, dhyeya siddhi
and grant us, o guardian of Atma-vidyA, the best amongst all, Atma-siddhi

O gaNesha, I may forget you in extreme favorable circumstances and I may doubt your very existence in bad circumstances, but you never forget us and always do what is necessary and good for spiritual upliftment of humanity.


O gaNesha, forgetfulness may be considered a sin, but it is indeed a boon, as it is good to forget our sins after repenting and making decision not to repeat them again, as one cannot live in guilt, nor under the burden of sins. With thy blessings, we forget what is unnecessary, but we may never forget you.


O gaNesha, may I not live in past, nor do I worry about future, may I always live in present moment, as that is what I am. Let me accept 'this moment' and dissolve in it to realise truth.


o gaNesha, bless us with detachment so that we can be extra gentle on ourselves and do not need to use any force or extra effort to stay detached, but stay as witness effortlessly simply by surrendering to this moment (the presence).

O gaNesha, the foremost of all deva-s, may we all know and abide in our true nature in this life itself.


।। ॐ शन्ति शन्ति शन्ति।।

।। हरि ॐ तत् सत् ।।

।। ॐ गम गणपतये नमः।।

Om shAnti shAnti shAnti

Hari Om Tat Sat

|| Om gam gaNapataye namaH ||

[Happy Diwali 2016] Vedas - 3 or 4?

$
0
0
|| Hari OM ||

Wishing you a Very Happy Deepavali and 
A Prosperous New Year - 2016

Oct-2016

The Vedas - 3 or 4?



There is a popular way of describing verses and associating with one particular veda-s. In order to distinguish verses of different veda-s, verses in each veda are called differently

rig vedic verse is called as rik (ṛk),

yajurvedi mantra as yajus, and

sAmavedic mantra as sAman


Note: atharvavedic mantra as not known by any different name like atharvan, etc.


Based on this classification, some say that atharva veda is late text and so cannot be compared to other three veda-s. In order to support their claim, they also cite verses from shAstra-s which say there are three veda-s like BG 9.20.

Some historians believe that rg veda is oldest and atharva veda is youngest amongst veda-s.

However, this understanding of classification is wrong. Kanchi Paramacharya says, ṛg veda manDala 10 contains the name of atharva veda and hence atharva veda is as old as ṛg veda.


There are only three styles to sing a vedic mantra - padya (poetry), gadya (prose), sāma (singing in an intonation which is pleasing to the Gods).

ṛk-s are padya पद्य (poetic) in nature,
yajus are gadya गद्य (prose) and
sāman-s are geya गेय i.e. that whose intonation is pleasing to the Gods.

There are many ways to categorize vedic mantra-s. This categorization is based on mantra. ṛg veda contains majority of sloka-s sung in ṛk way (Hence it is called as ṛg veda). yajurveda contains maximum number of yajus and sāma veda contains maximum number of sāmans. Atharva veda contains all three types of mantra-s - ṛk, yajus and sāma

So a rik verse i.e. verse sung in rg style can be present in yajur veda too. Likewise atharva veda contains yajus. So when one talks of yajus mantra-s (in general), they mean all the mantra-s sung in yajus style and not of yajur veda. It does not mean mantra-s of yajurveda. Traditional Brahmins are aware of this classification. Similarly, gAyatrI mantra is called as trI-padI and it covers three veda-s. Here, those well versed in tradition do not interpret the word 'veda' as proper noun i.e. it is associated with a particular veda. The word 'veda' means vidyA. trIpada (trIpadI) means sung in three different styles.


sAmaveda has most verses similar to rig veda but they are sung in a different way so as to please deva-s. It is believed that sAma veda has 95 mantra-s not found in rg veda. Singing originated from sAma veda. The sargama (7 basic sounds used in traditional Indian singing), sA, re, ga, ma, pa, dha, ni originated from sAma veda.


Ways of classification of vedic mantra-s are



1. karma-kāṇḍa

Vedic mantra-s are used in yajna-s. The one who is qualified to perform yajna is called as ṛtvika. There are four gaṇa-s of ṛtvika-s - hotṛgaṇa, adhvaryugaṇa, udgātṛgaṇa and brahmagaṇa. vedic mantra-s to be used by these four gaṇa-s are divided into four saṃhitā-s. saṃhitā useful for hotṛgaṇa is called as ṛgveda. Since this veda contains maximum number of ṛk-s (padya, poetry), it is called as ṛgveda. In order to conduct a yajna, saṃhitā useful to adhvaryugaṇa is called as yajurveda. In these veda, yajuḥ type of mantra-s i.e. gadya or prose are found to be maximum in nature hence this veda is called as yajurveda. In a yajna, those mantra-s which are useful to udgātṛgaṇa-s are called as sāmaveda as they have maximum number of sāma i.e. verses taht can be sung in intonation pleasant to Gods. In order to protect a yajna, someone has to kēp a watch on the entire process. Such a Brāhmin is called as brahmagaṇa. Mantra-s suitable to him are present in atharva deva. Since mistake can be done by either of three styles, atharva veda has mantra-s of all three types to correct or repent mistakes.


2. Based on application

In this category, mantra-s called categorized into matra and braahmaṇa. Those verses used in yajna-s are called as mantra-s. mantra-s used to perform yajna by the way of step-by-step procedure, stories, explanations and stuti-s, to explain procedure, further explanation, inner meaning, etc - all these is done by sloka-s is called as brāhmaṇa-s.


3. Based on type of mantra-s

We have already explained this type of classification. Here, the style of mantra is taken into account viz ṛk, yajus and sāma. Since ṛg veda contains maximum number of ṛk-s, it is calleda s ṛgveda. Similarly, yajurveda is so called as it contains maximum number of yajus and sāma veda contains maximum number of sāman-s. Atharvaveda contains all three types of mantra styles - ṛk, yajus and sāma. Hence when shāstra-s describe veda-s as vedatrayī i.e. three veda-s, all four veda-s are referred to.


4. Based on content or literature

Here the mantra-s are divided into four parts - saṃhitā, brāahmaṇa, āraṇyaka and upaniṣad. The mantra part of all four veda-s is called as saṃhitā. So there are five saṃhitā-s - ṛgdeva-saṃhitā, kṛṣṇa-yajurveda-saṃhitā, śukla-yajurveda-saṃhitā, sāmaveda-saṃhitā and atharvaveda-saṃhitā. In brāhmaṇa-s, step-by-step procedure of application of saṃhitā mantra-s, further explanation, phalaprāpti (fruits of yajna), etc are given. In āraṇyaka grantha-s, spiritual significance of various step-by-step procedures, mantra-s, phalashruti, etc are given. They indicate retirement and were told in araṇyaka, hence are called as āraṇyaka. The last part or the essence of veda-s is called as vedānta or upaniṣad. It teaches renunciation of karma and gives knowledge about highest truth - Brahman. Upaniṣads give brahma-vidyā.


General explanation given about categorization of Vedas
Following is the general explanation that is commonly given to explain categorization or division of veda-s. This explanation is repetitive, but is given for readers to get acquainted with standard replies to avoid confusion.

veda-s are divided into two main categories or groups. First one is mantra samhitā simply known as 'samhitā' and another group is brāhmaṇa as known as brāhmaṇagrantha. The word, according to Śrī Yaskāchārya jī, who developed nirukta, is that the word mantra has originated from the root 'man' (मन् ). The root word is called as 'dhātu' in sanskrit.

Pāṅchrātra saṁhitā, an āgamic text, defines mantra as 'that which protects when repeated' meaning by continuous repetition of any mantra, one gets protectd by it. The collection of mantra-s is called as samhitā.
Brāhmaṇa grantha-s give a direction on how to apply or use the mantra-s (given in saṁhitā). They give detailed explanation on the application of mantra. They are like a commentary on mantra, giving further insight into the dēper meaning of mantra. Brāhmaṇa grantha-s are divided into three parts - brāhmaṇa, āraṇyaka and vedānta or upaniṣada (Upanishad). Brāhmaṇa part deals karma kāṇḍa (vedic rituals, Yagna, Havana). Āraṇyaka deals with inner meaning of mantra-s and with the upāsanā kāṇḍa. The last i.e. vedānta covers the Jñāna kāṇḍa. Upanishads talk about the highest truth, the true import of the veda-s. vedānta means end of veda-s, after knowing which nothing more needs to be known. Here knowing refers to Direct Experience of one's True Nature.


To sum up:

Vedas are divided into four parts – samhitA, brAhmaNa, AraNyaka, upanishad (vedAnta)

samhitA-s are collection of mantras used for vedic rituals. They form major part of veda-s. Traditionally when one says 'veda' it means samhitA part.

brAhmaNa-s explain which and where a mantra or a collection of mantra-s are to be applied. They are further split into AraNyaka-s and vedAnta.

AraNyaka-s give inner meaning behind any ritual or practice. It is more connected with inner or mental practice.

vedAnta, i.e. veda-anta, as the name suggests is the end part of veda-s. anta means end. Here 'end' does not literally mean the 'end part' or the ‘last portion of veda’. It means the core or essence. Certain section found in samhitA and brAhmaNa-s are known as upanishads (vedAnta). For e.g. IshA upanishad is in the samhitA part, still it is called as an upanishad. samhitA-s are collection of mantra-s used for vedic rituals (yaGYA-s). 



आ नो भद्राः करतवो कष्यन्तु विश्वतो.अदब्धासो अपरीतास उद्भिदः |
ā no bhadrāḥ kratavo kṣyantu viśvato.adabdhāso aparītāsa udbhidaḥ |

MAY powers (thoughts / intelligence) auspicious [in nature] come to us from every side, never deceived, unhindered, and victorious - RV 1.89.1

OR Let Noble thoughts flow from all Directions - RV 1.89.1
|| Hari OM ||

Happy New Year 2017 - Few words on Prayer

$
0
0

Wishing You & Your Family

Happy New Year 2017


Few words on Prayer …


Pray to God to purify our hearts and give clarity.
Pray to God to forgive our debts.
Pray to God that we may not fall into temptation and free us from evil desires.
Pray for inner transformation so that we constantly feel the presence of God.

Prayers are quickly heard of those who feel God is very near to them.

When you pray, pray in closed doors, in secret.
When you pray, do not think that God will here if you make too much of noise.
When you pray, do not publicize it. It is a personal affair.

When you pray, use not vein repetitions
Let prayer flow through your heart …

Let it merge into infinite as river surrenders and merges into sea ...
Let us merge in God, stay rooted in him
And be filled with Love, Faith and Surrender
Let Joy erupt from our unconditional Surrender
And Live the way he wants us to Live …
And stay in circumstances he wants us to stay …
Without any complaint, without any trace of Ego …
Let us Surrender, be Happy and Contended, Overfilled with Inner Joy.
Let us enjoy inner beauty.

Let God Radiate his Divine Love through our hearts
Let us Surrender, be Happy and Contended, Overfilled with Inner Joy.
May this inner joy continue to radiate in our lives.
… Is my prayer from the Bottom of my Heart.

Happy New Year 2017!

Sri Ramakrishna: Sanyasi is a world teacher

$
0
0
Sri Ramakrishna: The sannyasi must observe very strict discipline. He must not look even at the picture of a woman. But this rule doesn't apply to householders. An aspirant should not associate with a woman, even though she is very much devoted to God. A sannyasi, even though he may have subdued his passions, should follow this discipline to set an example to householders.
Worldly people learn renunciation by seeing the complete renunciation of a monk; otherwise they sink more and more. A sannyasi is a world teacher.

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

Why doesn't God free us from the world?

$
0
0
About nine o'clock in the morning the Master was seated in his room with Rakhal, M., and a few other devotees. It was the day of the new moon. As usual with him on such days, Sri Ramakrishna entered again and again into communion with the Divine Mother. He said to the devotees: "God alone exists, and all else is unreal. The Divine Mother has kept all deluded by Her maya. Look at men. Most of them are entangled in worldliness. They suffer so much, but still they have the same attachment to 'woman and gold'. The camel eats thorny shrubs, and blood gushes from its mouth. Camel thinks it has extracted juice from plant and will continue to chew thorns. The more it chews, more blood flows, still camel keeps eating thorns. While suffering pain at the time of delivery, a woman says, 'Ah' I shall never go to my husband again.' But afterwards she forgets.

"The truth is that no one seeks God. There are people who eat the prickly leaves of the pineapple and not the fruit."

Devotee: "Thakur ji, why has God put us in the world?"

Sri Ramakrishna: "The world is the field of action. Through action one acquires knowledge. The guru instructs the disciple to perform certain works and refrain from others. Again, he advises the pupil to perform action without desiring the result. The impurity of the mind is destroyed through the performance of duty. It is like getting rid of a disease by means of medicine, under the instruction of a competent physician.

"Why doesn't God free us from the world? Ah, He will free us when the disease is cured. He will liberate us from the world when we are through with the enjoyment of 'woman and gold'. Once a man registers his name in the hospital, he cannot run away. The doctor will not let him go away unless his illness is completely cured."

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

ChatuH Sloki Bhagavat - Gujarati

$
0
0


।। श्री गुरुवे नमः ।। 
।। श्री कृष्ण परब्रह्मर्पणमस्तुः ।। 
।। श्री चतुः श्लोकि भागवत् ।।
ચતુઃ સ્લોકી ભાગવત્ - સસ્તુ સાહિત્ય


શ્રી ભગવાન બોલ્યા: હું તમને અનુભવ અને ભક્તિથી યુક્ત પરમ ગુહ્ય જ્ઞાન તથા તેનાં સાધનો કહું છું, તે તમે ગ્રહણ કરો; તેમ જ હું જેવા સ્વરૂપવાળો, જેવી સત્તાવાળો અને જેવાં રૂપ, ગુણ તથા કર્મવાળો છું, તે સર્વનું તાત્ત્વિક જ્ઞાન તમને મારી કૃપાથી પ્રાપ્ત થાઓ (તે જ્ઞાન આ પ્રમાણે છે:) સૃષ્ટિની પૂર્વે હું જ હતો, બીજુ જે સ્થૂળ, સૂક્ષ્મ, અને એ બન્નેનું જે કારણ માયા છે તે કંઈ ન હતું (કેમ કે તે વખતે માયા પણ અંતર્મુખપણે મારામાં લીન હતી), સૃષ્ટિની પછી પણ હું જ રહું છું. જે આ જગત દેખાય છે તે પણ હું જ છું અને પ્રલય પછી તે જે બાકી રહે છે તે પણ હું જ છું, જે વાસ્તવિક વસ્તુ નથીતેપણજેઆત્મારૂપઆશ્રયનેલીધેજણાયછેઅનેજેવાસ્તવિકવસ્તુનથી  જણાતી, તેને મારી માયા જાણવી. જેમ ચંદ્ર એક જ છે, તો પણ નેત્રના વિકારને લીધે બે હોય એવો આભાસ થાય છે. અને રાહુ ગ્રહમંડળમાં રહેલો છે તો પણ દેખાતો નથી. જેમ પાંચ મહાભૂતો નાનામોટા પ્રત્યેક ભૌતિક પદાર્થમાં સૃષ્ટિની પછી દાખલ થયેલાં છે. (કેમ કે તે તે પદાર્થોમાં તેઓ દેખાય છે) અને દાખલ થયેલાં પણ નથીં; (કેમ કે સૃષ્ટિ પહેલાં જ કારણસ્વરૂપે તે મહાભૂતો તે તે ભૌતિક પદાર્થોમાં રહેલાં જ છે) તેમ હું પણ તે તે મહાભૂતોમાં અને સર્વ ભૌતિક પદાર્થોમાં રહ્યો છું, છતાં નથી પણરહ્યો. આવી મારી સર્વત્ર સ્થિતિ છે. આત્માનું તાત્વિક સ્વરૂપ જાણવા ઇચ્છતા પુરુષે એટલું જ જાણવાનું બસ છે કે જે વસ્તુ અન્વય અને વ્યતિરેકથી[] સર્વ સ્થળે સર્વદા છે તે જ આત્મા છે. તમે મારા આ મતને સારી રીતે એકાગ્ર ચિત્તે અનુસરો, જેથી તમે પ્રત્યેક કલ્પની ભિન્ન ભિન્ન સૃષ્ટિમાં મોહ પામશો નહિ

[] અન્વય અને વ્યતિરેક તે આ પ્રમાણે દરેક કર્યમાં કારણસ્વરૂપે રહેવું તે અન્વય છે અને કારણ અવસ્થામાં તે તે કર્યોથી જુદા થવું તે વ્યતિરેક છે; અર્થાત્ જાગ્રત આદિઅવસ્થામાં તે તે અવસ્થાના સાક્ષીરૂપ આત્માનો અન્વય છે અને સમાધિ વગેરેમાં જાગ્રત, સ્વપ્ન તથા સુષુપ્તિથી વ્યતિરેક છે. – શ્રીધરસ્વામી

।। ईति श्री भगवानव्यासकृत चतुः श्लोकि भागवत् सम्पूर्णम् ।।
।। हरि ॐ ।।

Sri Ramakrishna on God with form and formless Brahman Satchidananda

$
0
0
Sri Ramakrishna went with the devotees to the northeast verandah of his room. Among them was a householder from the village of Dakshineswar, who studied Vedanta philosophy at home. He had been discussing Om with Kedar before the Master. He said, "This Eternal Word, the Anahata Sabda, is ever present both within and outside."

Sri Ramakrishna: "But the Word is not enough. There must be something indicated by the Word. Can your name alone make me happy? Complete happiness is not possible for me unless I see you."

Devotee: "That Eternal Word itself is Brahman."

Sri Ramakrishna (to Kedar): "Oh, don't you understand? He upholds the doctrine of the rishis of olden times. They once said to Rama: 'O Rama, we know You only as the son of Dasaratha. Let sages like Bharadvaja worship You as God Incarnate. We want to realize Brahman, the Indivisible Existence-Knowledge-Bliss Absolute.' At these words Rama smiled and went away." 

Kedar: "Those rishis could not recognize Rama as an Incarnation of God. They must have been fools."

Sri Ramakrishna (seriously): "Please don't say such a thing. People worship God according to their tastes and temperaments. The mother cooks the same fish differently for her children, that each one may have what suits his stomach. For some she cooks the rich dish of pilau. But not all the children can digest it. For those with weak stomachs she prepares soup. Some, again, like fried fish or pickled fish. It depends on one's taste.

"The rishis followed the path of jnana. Therefore they sought to realize Brahman, the Indivisible Existence-Knowledge-Bliss Absolute. But those who follow the path of devotion seek an Incarnation of God, to enjoy the sweetness of bhakti. The darkness of the mind disappears when God is realized. In the Purana it is said that it was as if a hundred suns were shining when Rama entered the court. Why, then, weren't the courtiers burnt up? It was because the brilliance of Rama was not like that of a material object. As the lotus blooms when the sun rises, so the lotus of the heart of the people assembled in the court burst into blossom."

As Sri Ramakrishna uttered these words, standing before the devotees, he suddenly fell into an ecstatic mood. His mind was withdrawn from external objects. No sooner did he say, "the lotus of the heart burst into blossom", than he went into deep samadhi. He stood motionless, his countenance beaming and his lips parted in a smile.

After a long time he returned to the normal consciousness of the world. He drew a long breath and repeatedly chanted the name of Rama, every word showering nectar into the hearts of the devotees. Sri Ramakrishna sat down, the others seating themselves around him.

Sri Ramakrishna (to the devotees): "Ordinary people do not recognize the advent of an Incarnation of God. He comes in secret. Only a few of His intimate disciples can recognize Him. That Rama was both Brahman Absolute and a perfect Incarnation of God in human form was known only to twelve rishis. The other sages said to Him, 'Rama, we know You only as Dasaratha's son.' 

"Can everyone comprehend Brahman, the Indivisible Existence-Knowledge-Bliss Absolute? He alone has attained perfect love of God who, having reached the Absolute, keeps himself in the realm of the Relative in order to enjoy the divine lila. A man can describe the ways and activities of the Queen (Queen Victoria.) if he has previously visited her in England. Only then will his description of the Queen be correct. Sages like Bharadvaja adored Rama and said: 'O Rama, You are nothing but the Indivisible Satchidananda. You have appeared before us as a human being, but You look like a man because You have shrouded Yourself with Your own maya.' These rishis were great devotees of Rama and had supreme love for God."

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

Sri Ramakrishna on Bhakti and Importance of Vairagya

$
0
0
After his meal Sri Ramakrishna rested a little on the small couch. Inside and outside his room crowded the devotees, among them Kedar, Suresh, Ram, Manomohan, Girindra, Rakhal, Bhavanath, and M. Rakhal's father was also present.

A Vaishnava goswami was seated in the room. Sri Ramakrishna said to him:

"Well, what do you say? What is the way?"

Goswami: "Sir, the chanting of God's name is enough. The scriptures emphasize the sanctity of God's name for the Kaliyuga."


Sri Ramakrishna: "Yes, there is no doubt about the sanctity of God's name. But can a mere name achieve anything, without the yearning love of the devotee behind it?One should feel great restlessness of soul for the vision of God.Suppose a man repeats the name of God mechanically, while his mind is absorbed in 'woman and gold'. Can he achieve anything? Mere muttering of magic words doesn't cure one of the pain of a spider or scorpion sting. One must also apply the smoke of burning cow-dung." (A primitive medicine used by the villagers for scorpion bites.)

Goswami: "But what about Ajamila then? He was a great sinner; there was no sin he had not indulged in. But he uttered the name of Narayana on his death-bed, calling his son, who also had that name. And thus he was liberated."

Sri Ramakrishna: "Perhaps Ajamila had done many spiritual things in his past births. It is also said that he once practised austerity; besides, those were the last moments of his life. What is the use of giving an elephant a bath? It will cover itself with dirt and dust again and become its former self. But if someone removes the dust from its body and gives it a bath just before it enters the stable, then the elephant remains clean.

"Suppose a man becomes pure by chanting the holy name of God, but immediately afterwards commits many sins. He has no strength of mind. He doesn't take a vow not to repeat his sins. A bath in the Ganges undoubtedly absolves one of all sins; but what does that avail? They say that the sins perch on the trees along the bank of the Ganges. No sooner does the man come back from the holy waters than the old sins jump on his shoulders from the trees. (All laugh.) The same old sins take possession of him again. He is hardly out of the water before they fall upon him.

"Therefore I say, chant the name of God, and with it pray to Him that you may have love for Him. Pray to God that your attachment to such transitory things as wealth, name, and creature comforts may become less and less every day.

Source: Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna

Sri Ramana Maharshi on Many Gods, Relative Existence and Supreme Truth

$
0
0
Legends:
D: Devotee
B: Bhagavan (Sri Ramana Maharshi)

Sometimes questions were also asked about the multiple gods of Hinduism. In this connection it should be explained that Hindus, like Christians or Muslims worship the One God.Some of the questions about God recorded above were put by Hindus. However, they also worship God manifested in various forms, one possibility or name or form or viewpoint not negating another.

D.: Why are so many gods mentioned?

B.: The body is only one, but how many functions are performed by it! The source of all these functions is one. It is the same with the gods.
It would sometimes be asked whether the various gods and their heavens were real. But such a question starts from the presumption of the reality of this physical world and the questioner’s body – a presumption which Bhagavan would not admit. Instead, he would turn this question, like all others, to the quest for Reality.

D.: Are the Gods, Ishvara and Vishnu, and their heavens, Kailas and Vaikuntha, real?

B.: As real as you are in this body.

D.: I mean, have they got a phenomenal existence like my body, or are they pure fictions like the horns of a hare?

B.: They do exist.

D.: If so, they must be somewhere; where are they?

B.: In you.

D.: Then they are only my idea; something which I create and control?

B.: Everything is.

D.: But I can create a pure fiction like the horns of a hare, or a partial truth, like a mirage; while there are also facts which exist irrespective of my imagination. Do the gods, Ishvara and Vishnu, exist like that?

B.: Yes.

D.: Is God subject to cosmic dissolution at the end of a cycle?

B.: Why should He be? A man who realises the Self transcends cosmic dissolution and is liberated; why should not Ishvara (God) who is infinitely wiser and abler than a man?

D.: Do gods and devils also exist?

B.: Yes.

D.: How are we to conceive of Supreme Divine Consciousness?

B.: As that which is.
Particularly interesting are the questions asked by a Muslim professor about the hymns which Bhagavan wrote to God in the form of Arunachala.

D.: I have been reading the Five Hymns. I find that the hymns are addressed by you to Arunachala. But you are a non-dualist, so how can you address God as a separate Being?

B.: The devotee, God and the hymns are all the Self.

D.: But you are addressing God. You are specifying this Arunachala Hill as God.

B.: You can identify the Self with the body, so why shouldn’t the devotees identify the Self with Arunachala?

D.: If Arunachala is the Self, why should it be specifically picked out among so many other hills? God is everywhere. Why do you specify Him as Arunachala?

B.: What has attracted you from Allahabad to this place? What has attracted all these people around?

D.: Sri Bhagavan.

B.: How was I attracted here? By Arunachala. The Power cannot be denied. Again Arunachala is within and not without. The Self is Arunachala.

D.: Several terms are used in the holy books. Atman, Paramatman, Para, etc. What is the gradation among them?

B.: They mean the same to the user of the words but they are understood differently by various persons according to their development.

D.: But why do you use so many words to mean the same thing?

B.: It depends on the circumstances. They all mean the Self. Para means not relative, or beyond the relative, that is to say the Absolute.

Bogger's Note: In this Q and A i.e. conversation, 

  • Bhagavan  gives importance to going deep within i.e. becoming introvert.
  • For this to happen, outside world and other subtle worlds are to be neglected. Focus has to be on SELF, 'I' or Brahman
  • Yet on vyavahArika satya i.e. empirical reality, our own existence, existence of various Gods and Goddesses and demi-gods and demi-godesses and their worlds is accepted.
  • The power of God is also accepted and revered. It cannot be neglected. Hence hymns on Arunachala were composed. But from standpoint of Atma-sthiti i.e. Supreme Reality, only one tatva exists. It is 'I' or 'Atman' or Brahman. SAntam Sivam Advaitam. Here Siva is not Lord Rudra or Shankara Bhagavan, but nirguNa and nirAkAra tatva i.e. attribuless, formless pure consciousness

Source: Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi in his own words – Arthur Osborne
Viewing all 256 articles
Browse latest View live